Adi sued the "Cottage" sneaker winning the online shop "Shen Zhen" lost

The day before yesterday morning, Shanghai No. 2 Intermediate People's Court concentrating on a batch of cases involving infringement of intellectual property rights. Adidas won the adidas trademark violation. In another case, a seller of Taobao.com was punished and was sued for "Shenzheng." The result was defeated.

At the end of last year, Bailuchi Company entrusted Zhonglian Company to sell a group of women's sports casual shoes. Adidas believes that these products infringe its intellectual property rights and entrusted a notary office to purchase two pairs of shoes and issue a notary certificate. Afterwards, the company sued Bailuchi Company and Zhonglian Company to the Second Intermediate People's Court, demanding that it stop the infringement, compensate for the loss and report the cancellation of the impact.

The Second Intermediate People's Court held that the three bars marked on both sides of the upper and lower sides of the sued sports shoes were basically indistinguishable from those of Adidas. Bailuchi Company uses the same trademark on the same product without permission from Adidas and constitutes infringement. As a sporting goods operator, Zhonglian Company has not paid due attention to the goods it sells. It is obviously faulty and it also constitutes infringement. The second grade hospital's decision to support the original told.

Since April 2007, Zhu Jingjing, owner of Taobao “Lijia Small Shop”, has publicly sold counterfeit bags and purses such as “LV”, “GUCCI”, “CHANEL” and “DIOR”, and the sales amount has exceeded 200,000 yuan. In March of this year, public security agencies seized 593 counterfeit designer bags in Zhu Jingjing’s rented room. Since then, Zhu was sentenced to 10 months imprisonment for the sale of counterfeited trademark goods, and a fine of 5,000 yuan, confiscation of counterfeit goods.

After the verdict of the first instance, Zhu Jingjing thought that he had reported the meritorious case of crime disclosure and appealed to Shanghai No. 2 Intermediate People's Court, requesting a lighter punishment. After the review of the Second Intermediate People's Court, Zhu Jingjing’s grounds for appeal were not established and he dismissed the appeal and upheld the original verdict.